W1 corpus pour — Social Anthropology: A Psycho-Analytic Study in Anthropology and a History of Australian Totemism
receipt:work:australian-totemism · vw1 · ingest_verified
sha256 af3ce8397b3d71c06ea1c3f1a05da19ac2e07c63e5235d1d519a00550ca5fafa
A receipt records what the house consulted and what it did not establish. The open state is part of the record, not a defect in it.
1works · 10episodes · 1shelves
- Géza Róheim, Social Anthropology / Australian Totemism (1926; Archive.org socialanthropolo0000rhei)Archive.org DjVu OCR text of the 1926 Boni and Liveright first American edition (identifier socialanthropolo0000rhei; School of Theology at Claremont copy)license: Public Domainpinned: sha256 4db4f33e995bcc944a724e51e9722802e3f92ec01f785dd5cf6d638d3b24a34b;4db4f33e995bcc944a724e51e9722802e3f92ec01f785dd5cf6d638d3b24a34b
10 episodes of "Social Anthropology: A Psycho-Analytic Study in Anthropology and a History of Australian Totemism" were segmented from the sha256-pinned source file, poured, and count- and hash-verified against this database by direct query. The receipt's content_hash is sha256("anthropoi-work-pour-v1|" + work.id + "|episodes=" + N + "|" + the comma-joined episode text_sha256 values in ordinal order) — recomputable by anyone from SELECTs on this record.
What this does not prove- That the segmentation reflects a scholarly apparatus — episodes follow this edition's own headings.
- That OCR-derived text is error-free — see each episode's audit_state (ocr_uncorrected is carried honestly).
- That the work's claims are true — ingestion verifies text integrity and provenance, not anthropology.
- Anything about passages of this work not present in these episodes (front matter and indexes are excluded by documented rules).